Deer Love November 7, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Wisconsin Auto Accidents.Tags: auto accident, Wisconsin Auto Accidents
add a comment
It’s that time of year in Wisconsin and across the nation. It’s the rut. That’s when every buck tries to find a doe.
According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety approximately 223 people died in animal-vehicle crashes in 2007.
institute records revealed from January 2005 through April 2008, animal-vehicle collisions were three times more likely during November.
Rural areas with speed limits around 55 mph were most dangerous. They note that collisions were more likely to happen between dusk and dawn. So, if you are going to the cabin to get set for the upcoming deer season be careful driving!
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Marinette, Milwaukee, Milton and Wauwatosa.
Take Responsibility Dog Owners! November 6, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Dog Attack Information.Tags: Dog Attack Information, Wisconsin Dog Bite Attorney, Wisconsin Dog Bite Law, Wisconsin Dog Bites
add a comment
The Manitowoc Herald Times Reporter noted a frustrating story about a dog bite victim. A Keil woman was attacked by a dog. It appears that, at first, she didn’t realize that the dog broke her skin. The dog’s owners left the scene and didn’t give any identifiable information. Soon thereafter the victim noticed that the dog broke her skin. She went to the hospital and was told that because no one knew whether the dogs were up on all of their shots she would have to undergo rabies vaccination shots.
This is just another example of a victim of a dog bite having to undergo potentially unnecessary medical care. The victim may have to worry about having rabies, the pain of the shots not to mention the time away from work and her family. There isn’t an update so I don’t know whether they ever found the dog owners.
Wouldn’t it just be easier if the dog owner stuck around and gave the victim her information? No matter how small the bite seems at first why not just exchange information? If the dogs don’t have rabies then all this would not have to happen.
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Racine, Wauwatosa, New Berlin and Manitowoc.
Nursing Home Admitted Residents Just for the Profit? November 5, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Injury Law.Tags: Nursing Home Abuse, wisconsin personal injury, Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney
add a comment
The truth of the matter is that there are companies in America that will do anything for profits. This includes injuring those people that the company is supposed to help and protect.
A lawsuit has been filed in Seattle against Milwaukee based Extendicare Health Services. The suit alleges that:
Extendicare is “more interested in protecting themselves from liability and thereby increasing profits than protecting the rights, health and safety of their own elderly and vulnerable residents”
The plaintiffs are:
two former residents and a man whose daughter died at Aldercrest Health & Rehabilitation Center in Edmonds after her tracheal tube clogged with mucus within 24 hours of being admitted.
For what its worth Carl Tabor, Extendicare’s area director says:
plaintiffs have mischaracterized the company’s admission agreement. He said government inspectors have never cited it for problems.
The problems with some nursing homes is that they cut too many corners in order to save a few bucks. Companies must make a profit in order to survive. They must make a profit in order to pay salaries and hire more people. But, especially in the nursing home field, these companies cannot cut too many corners. We are dealing with people and their families not some widget.
There must be checks and balances to make sure that the residents are protected.
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Milwaukee, Milton, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.
Very Disappointed – MPD November 4, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Personal Injury Law.add a comment
An older woman just committed suicide. She jumped from a parking structure a few hundred feet from our office building. Please pray for this woman’s family.
It is unbelievable that this just happened. It’s one thing to read about stuff like this. It’s another to be an active spectator. She was obviously troubled and stood on the top of the parking structure for over 30 minutes before jumping into an alley.
I say “active spectator” because I called the police at about noon (12:01 according to the police). We noticed her about 11:57 but initially thought she was just standing on top of the parking structure smoking. I went and got some lunch and returned about 12:20. She was still there. When she straddled the guardrail I called the police again (maybe about 12:25 or so) The 911 dispatcher said an officer was already on the scene. We didn’t see any officers. But, our view of the inside of the parking structure is partially blocked.
I walked over to get a drink, came back to my office and didn’t see her anymore. I said something like “she’s gone”. Then, seconds later I got a call from a co-worker who said she jumped. I called the police again. A few minutes later the fire department, police detectives and a squad car arrived.
So, what took so long? I was just interviewed by a police officer. He said that the Milwaukee Police Department received a call about the situation BEFORE my initial call. That means that over 30 minutes transpired from the time the police were aware and the time she jumped.
The officer stated that dispatch initially didn’t say anything about the jumper being on TOP of the parking structure. Huh? Isn’t that a pretty important piece of information. I’d expect the dispatcher to tell the police on the scene the exact location (not to mention take notes of our conversation and tell the police what the caller said).
Why would it take 30 minutes to get to the scene? Unbelievable.
Now who knows whether the police would have been able to stop this woman. But, because it took them over a half hour to get to the scene we’ll never know.
UPDATE: The negotiator came to our office a few hours later. He talked to one of our staff and said that the police were looking for a person walking in the street. Allegedly someone called around the same time and said there was a pedestrian walking in the street. So, the police went looking for that person thinking it was the person who I called about. But, again, I called about a person who might “jump” from on top of a parking structure. How is that similar? Why didn’t the police just look up? Shouldn’t they check all leads? And, when I called back the second time about the person on top of the parking structure why did they say someone was on the scene when they were not. I guess at that point the police were looking for a pedestrian NOT a jumper. Unbelievable.
Drug Litigation November 4, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Injury Law.Tags: wisconsin personal injury, Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney
add a comment
Monday was a big day in the world of drug litigation law. The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Wyeth v. Levine case.
The case is about a lot of stuff but it started out as a medical malpractice/improper administering of a drug case:
The case came from Vermont, where a guitarist, Diana Levine, won a $6.8 million judgment against Wyeth after misadministration of its drug Phenergan caused gangrene and required the amputation of her hand and forearm. The antinausea drug is normally injected into muscle, but the label also provides directions for intravenous use.
The case is before the United State Supreme Court because there is a difference of opinion between state law and federal law:
In February, an 8-1 court found that federal law, which explicitly pre-empted state regulation of medical devices, implicitly blocked private negligence lawsuits as well. In 2006, by contrast, the Vermont Supreme Court found no conflict between federal law and the judgment against Wyeth.
Keep track of this case. It’s pretty big news in the world of personal injury attorneys.
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Janesville, Athelstane, Sheboygan and Wauwatosa.
MyKey – Ford and Parents November 3, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Wisconsin Auto Accidents.Tags: Wisconsin Auto Accidents, wisconsin personal injury, Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney
add a comment
Next year Ford will roll out a new feature on its Focus. It’s supposed to help parents keep a handle on their kids. Through controls on any key a parent can limit a vehicle’s top speed to 80 miles per hour.
In addition to speed limits, MyKey also will limit the volume of the audio system, and it will sound a six-second chime every minute if seat belts are not fastened. The chime sounds for adult drivers, too, but ends after five minutes to avoid annoying adults who adamantly don’t want to wear seat belts, Buczkowski said. Parents also have the option of having the car sound a chime if the teen exceeds 45, 55 or 65 mph.
As an injury attorney this is a very interesting piece of technology. Once it is on the streets I’ll ask every at fault driver of a Focus for all information about their MyKey system. I wonder if it will store how many times parents change the limits?
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Milwaukee, Marinette, Milton and Wauwatosa.
Update On Efficacy of Drunk Driving Laws October 29, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Drunk Driving.Tags: Drunk Drivers, drunk driving poll, Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney
add a comment
Mike and Sean commented on my earlier drunk driving post. They asked whether stiff drunk driving laws reduce accidents and injuries. Good question. I did my usual google search and found a study that dates way back to 1987. It was a Purdue University study that found that drunk driving accidents decreased by 20% after stiffer laws were enacted. But, the number of hit and run accidents increased by 8%.
I’ll keep looking for a recent statistic. If you find one please comment!
Thanks for the comments!
Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Marinette, Milwaukee, Milton and Wauwatosa.
One Week From Today October 28, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Groth.add a comment
The Journal Sentinel reported about a law that dates back to 1945. All voters are:
entitled to be absent from work while the polls are open for a period not to exceed three successive hours
Voters don’t get paid for the time off work. Also:
the law prohibits employers from penalizing workers in any way for requesting time off to vote
If you want to take advantage of the law I’d suggest you make arrangements with your employer sooner rather than later.
Operating While Under the Influence Poll October 27, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Drunk Driving.Tags: Drunk Driver, Drunk Driving, drunk driving poll, Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney
5 comments
WordPress just made polls available on their blogging service. So, let’s put it to good use.
UPDATE: H/T Sean Sweeney. The graphic from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel states “Number of OWI arrests before it becomes a felony.” I think Sean is right. It should say “Number of OWI convictions.” Good catch Sean!
Thanks for your input!
Thanks for Attending the Wisconsin Solo and Small Firm Conference October 25, 2008
Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Groth.Tags: attorney, CLE
4 comments
On behalf of the other speakers, committee members and program chairs, Thanks! This was a very successful conference. We covered everything from intellectual property, practice management and marketing to personal injury and, of course, cutting edge technology and blogging.
I’d like to thank Rob Teuber and Chris Moander for helping put together a great presentation on Blogging, Podcasts and the Internet. I hope that our audience got some useful information from yesterday’s presentation.




