jump to navigation

Recalled Products in 2008 November 26, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Personal Injury Law.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

So far there have been about 354 recalled products in the United States.  These products were recalled for various safety and health concerns.

Of these 354 products:

  • 52 or 15% were manufactured in the United States
  • 302 or 85% from foreign countries

Of the products recalled from foreign countries 201 were manufactured in China.

The American Association for Justice states:

This is significant because foreign manufacturers can set their prices lower because they are not subject to the equal prospect of restitution as U.S. manufacturers face if a consumer is injured by their product.  Also, foreign manufacturers often face huge discrepancies in product liability insurance rates.  Without the prospect of being held accountable through the U.S. civil justice system, a foreign producer has little incentive to maximize product quality and safety.

I’ve discussed the topic of recalls in past.  As we enter the toy buying season please be aware of what you purchase.  Not all toys are equal.  Lead based paint in toys and melamine in candies and other foods make me very weary of buying anything manufactured in China.  But how do you avoid it?

 ww.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Waukesha, Beloit, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.

The Safe Cars of 2009 November 25, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury.
Tags: , ,
2 comments

In short, don’t buy a Chrysler. 

The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety released it’s safe cars list.   Ford (including its Volvo subsidiary) topped the list with 16 vehicles.  Honda came in second with 13 vehicles.

Why do I say don’t buy a Chrysler.  Well, Chrysler didn’t win any awards.  None.   

The story that I link to above states:

Seventy-two cars, trucks and SUVs received the top safety pick designation for the 2009 model year, more than double the number of vehicles in 2008 and three times the number in 2007.

“No matter what kind of vehicle buyers may be considering, now they can walk into just about any dealership and find one that affords the best overall protection in serious crashes,” said Institute president Adrian Lund.

But when it comes to Chrysler:

IIHSsaid Chrysler LLC was the only major automaker that did not receive a single award. They said Chrysler could have picked up five awards if the head restraints had been improved.

I may be a little biased against Chrysler.  My Dad owned a K car in the ’80s.  He didn’t like it.  I think he didn’t like it so much that I’ve been tainted. 

For full disclosure I own a Ford and Saab.

www.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Fond du lac, West Bend, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.

It’s the Time of Year for Toys (Dangerous Toys) November 24, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Injury Law.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

The group W.A.T.C.H. (World Against Toys Causing Harm Inc.) recently released its “Ten Worst Toys” list.  The most common reasons are “Eye Injuries,” “Choking Injuries” and “Other Serious Injuries.”  Simply put, these are dangerous toys.

I can say, as a father, I would not let my 3 and 1/2 year old play with nunchucks when he turns 4.  If that makes me a bad father so be it.  According to W.A.T.C.H.:

4-year-old children are encouraged to play the part of a Ninja, while wielding various weapons. One such weapon is Michelangelo’s “Nunchaku”, which the manufacturer describes as a “Kick-butt signature weapon!” consisting of two long plastic handles connected by a plastic chain. Remarkably, there are no accompanying cautions or warnings relating to potential impact injuries.

 I was a TMNT fan as a kid.  But, my parents would never have let me own nunchucks as a 4 year old.  Who is the marketing genius that came up with this marketing scheme?  It reminds me of the Dan Aykroyd skit from SNL.

www.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Shawano, Algoma, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.

Google Alerts and Litigation November 21, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Personal Injury Law.
Tags:
add a comment

I wrote about this topic a few weeks ago.  There isn’t much to add other than an interview I recently gave to the Wisconsin Law Journal.

Thanks Super Lawyers and Rising Stars November 20, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury.
add a comment

Law and Politics Magazine just released its annual edition covering those lawyers chosen by their peers as either Super Lawyers or Rising Stars.  Super Lawyers are those lawyers practicing law for 10 years or more.  Rising Stars are under 40 years old or have practiced law for less than 10 years.   No more than 2.5% of lawyers in the state are named Rising Stars.

I am thankful that my peers selected me as a Wisconsin Rising Star.

Who Is Responsible for Little Jimmy? November 20, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Personal Injury Law, Wisconsin Auto Accidents.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

So, who should you sue if a minor caused a collision?  Well, according to Wisconsin law Section 343.15(2)(b)

(b) Any negligence or willful misconduct of a person under the age of 18 years when operating a motor vehicle upon the highways is imputed to the parents where both have custody and either parent signed as sponsor, otherwise, it is imputed to the adult sponsor who signed the application for such person’s license. The parents or the adult sponsor is jointly and severally liable with such operator for any damages caused by such negligent or willful misconduct.

What does this mean?  If anyone under the age of 18 causes a car accident a plaintiff in Wisconsin should first worry about finding an insurance company to name in the Summons and Complaint.  Then name the negligent child along with both parents.  Leave enough time in before the statute of limitations runs to allow for discovery to know exactly who are the “proper” parents or sponsor per statute.

Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in West AllisSheboygan,  Plymouth,  and  Germantown.

If you’d like to submit a question or case please complete a case submission form.

Talk to Your Personal Injury Attorney Before You Sign the Retainer November 18, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Dog Attack Information, Drunk Driving, FAQ Personal Injury, Motorcycle Collisions, Personal Injury Law, Wisconsin Auto Accidents.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

The PersonalInjuryLawyerMichiganBlog.com has a good post about talking with your soon-to-be personal injury lawyer.   According to this blog here are a few things to watch for:

  • Fees. How much is the lawyer going to take of the settlement? It shouldn’t be an excessive amount.
  • Honesty. Do you get a sense he is over inflating your potential award settlement or chance of winning to get you as a client? Like the saying goes, if sounds good to be true if probably is. That’s not to say that you don’t have a good case, but an experienced lawyer knows that most companies won’t sit quietly by as you sue them. He or she should let you know honestly what to expect.
  • Quality. Does your lawyer answer all your questions so that you understand them or do you feel rushed through? You want to work with someone who is willing to get all the details and to work with you to get what you deserve. You don’t want a lawyer with a thousand clients, giving a half effort because he’s happy if a few of the lawsuits get paid.

Believe me, if you go to your initial meeting with a personal injury attorney with a list of questions and a trusted friend or family member in tow it will be a good/productive meeting.  I see it as refreshing not insulting. 

Hiring a personal injury attorney is a big decision.  Be sure to google search the attorney.  Look up their rating, cases and lawyers in the office or office share. 

The more information the better.

www.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Shawano, Algoma, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.

What Safety Features Would a Personal Injury Attorney Look for In a Vehicle November 17, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Motorcycle Collisions, Wisconsin Auto Accidents.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

H/T to Attorney Michael Pines for this blog topic.

I agree with his 7 points:

1.    High Crash Test Scores: Almost all motor vehicle makes and models for sale in the United States are supposed to undergo a series of crash tests conducted by the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).  The most important crash ratings to look for are those for front and side car crashes and rollover resistance, as most serious injuries occur as a result of these types of auto accidents.

2.    Antilock Braking System: When used properly, these new brake systems should allow for shorter stopping distances on slippery roads, and maintenance of steering control.  They are also important in preventing vehicles from hydroplaning, which could potentially prevent a serious car accident.

3.    Side-Impact Airbags:Front driver and passenger airbags are now required in all makes and models of vehicles as a necessary safety feature.  Additionally, many makes and models of vehicles also include side-impact and side curtain airbags as well.  Side-impact airbags are very important for protecting the torso of the occupants since there is no crumple zone to absorb the shock from a side auto accident collision.  Therefore, these airbags have been proven to save many lives in side auto accident collisions and are a very important safety feature in all vehicles.

4.    Side Curtain Airbags: Not to be confused with side-impact airbags, which protect the torso, side curtain airbags are intended to protect the head and neck from serious injury in a side collision car accident.  Again, there is not as much crumple zone to absorb the shock of side collisions, so side curtain airbags are very important, and are becoming a standard feature in most makes and models of vehicles.

5.    Rear-Parking Sensors:Especially important on larger vehicles such as trucks and SUVs, which provide larger rear blind spots, these sensors are especially useful in detecting objects as well as small children who may not be visible through the rear window or rear-view mirror.  Many vehicles are now also coming equipped with rear cameras, which have already proven to be helpful in preventing a number pedestrian and car accidents.

6.    Good Tires:While this may seem like an obvious statement, many people tend to overlook the safety advantages of well-maintained tires.  Bad tires have been proven to be a major cause of many preventable auto accidents.  Be sure to have your tires rotated, properly inflated air pressure, and replaced regularly to ensure maximum safety.  Also, it is a good idea to examine the tire’s brand.  As car accident lawyers, we remember the terrible auto accidents that occurred with Firestone/Bridgestone tires just a few years ago.

7.    Cargo Netting or a Cargo Cage: Many injuries in car accidents result from objects inside the vehicle striking the occupants and causing bodily harm.  Cargo nets can help to reduce and even prevent these types of injuries that can occur when involved in an auto accident.

Before I purchase a car, I go to the NHTSA’s website and do a search.  Safety is our first concern (to quote Thomas the Train’s Sir Topham Hatt).

www.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Waukesha, Beloit, Kenosha and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.

Bisphenol A (BPA) More Prevelant Than You Think November 16, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in FAQ Personal Injury, Personal Groth, Personal Injury Law.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s lead story today talks about Bisphenol A (BPA).  I bet most people without kids aren’t aware of the controversy over BPA.  Long story short, there is a concern over BPA’s effect on fetal and infant brain development and behavior.

In April, 2008 Canada stated it intended to ban the sale, import and advertisement of baby bottles containing BPA.   Since then there has been scores of stories and reports on the dangers of BPA and the prevalence of BPA. 

There are two sides to every story.  Here is the Food and Drug Administration’s official statement:

FDA is not recommending that anyone discontinue using products that contain BPA while we continue our risk assessment process. However, concerned consumers should know that several alternatives to polycarbonate baby bottles exist, including glass baby bottles

Today’s story is news because it highlights some of the common household items that contain BPA.  And the report that simply microwaving or dishwashing items with BPA releases the chemical. 

The story reports:

Products marketed for infants or billed as “microwave safe” release toxic doses of the chemical bisphenol A when heated, an analysis by the Journal Sentinel has found.

Read the story and check out the pdfs attached.  But, like always, be sure to read it carefully.  The pdf entitled “How to avoid bisphenol A” talks about the relative safety of plastics marked with 1 PETE, 2 HDPE, 4 LDPE, and 5 PP describing them as “safer.” 

Yet, the story on JSOnline.com states:

Food companies advise parents worried about BPA to avoid microwaving food in plastic containers, especially those with the recycling No. 7 stamped on the bottom.

But the Journal Sentinel’s testing found BPA leaching from containers with different recycling numbers, including Nos. 1, 2 and 5.

Check out your kitchen cupboards.  We bought glass bottles for our little one.  Why take the risk?

UPDATE: Check out this US News Article from September about how to avoid BPA.

Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in West AllisSheboygan,  Plymouth,  and  Germantown.

If you’d like to submit a question or case please complete a case submission form.

From A Juror’s View November 14, 2008

Posted by Attorney Jonathan Groth in Personal Injury Law.
Tags: ,
2 comments

Everything is a matter of perspective.  From my perspective I’d love to be a juror.  I’d get to see the “inner workings” of the jury’s deliberation room.  I think most litigators read everything they can about juror behavior (and human behavior for that matter).

The New York Personal Injury Blog has a good post about a juror’s experience.  The juror just happens to be the attorney’s wife.  Take note of the comments in italics.  Attorney Turkewitz makes some very good points.

www.jonpgroth.com

 Jon Groth is a Wisconsin Personal Injury Attorney handling cases throughout Wisconsin and most recently in Janesville, Athelstane, Sheboygan and Wauwatosa.

Click here to submit a Case or Question.