<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Safe Cars of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonpgroth.com/2008/11/25/the-safe-cars-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonpgroth.com/2008/11/25/the-safe-cars-of-2009/</link>
	<description>The Most Up-To-Date Info About Personal Injury Law in Wisconsin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonpgroth</title>
		<link>http://jonpgroth.com/2008/11/25/the-safe-cars-of-2009/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonpgroth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisconsinpersonalinjuryattorneys.wordpress.com/?p=542#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment Hemi.  I assume your email is Hemi because you are a Chrysler supporter.  Take my post for what it was, just a few paragraphs with a link to the article.  Read the article.  If you are purchasing a car simply because of that study then don&#039;t buy a Chrysler.  Isn&#039;t that what someone could pull from the article?  It says Chrysler didn&#039;t win any &#039;awards&#039;.   FYI, I&#039;m probably going to buy a Chrysler mini van soon.  I happen to think Chryslers are safe enough to transport my wife and kids.  Hope that makes you feel better!

Jon Groth]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Hemi.  I assume your email is Hemi because you are a Chrysler supporter.  Take my post for what it was, just a few paragraphs with a link to the article.  Read the article.  If you are purchasing a car simply because of that study then don&#8217;t buy a Chrysler.  Isn&#8217;t that what someone could pull from the article?  It says Chrysler didn&#8217;t win any &#8216;awards&#8217;.   FYI, I&#8217;m probably going to buy a Chrysler mini van soon.  I happen to think Chryslers are safe enough to transport my wife and kids.  Hope that makes you feel better!</p>
<p>Jon Groth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemidakota</title>
		<link>http://jonpgroth.com/2008/11/25/the-safe-cars-of-2009/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemidakota]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisconsinpersonalinjuryattorneys.wordpress.com/?p=542#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford is considered the number two worst built car in America. Number one is Chevy, #4 is toyota, and #5 is Honda. So much for research and acknowledging truth. Bias opinions is not welcome anywhere. If you like, you can subscribed to speculation, Consumer Report Magazine. 

I can see why you are a lawyer. Didn&#039;t do a complete research to see that both the 2009 Dodge Ram and Challenger won five-stars. I won&#039;t go into the two of the minis won the same for 09. 

Stick with law for your lack of auto knowledge is revealing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is considered the number two worst built car in America. Number one is Chevy, #4 is toyota, and #5 is Honda. So much for research and acknowledging truth. Bias opinions is not welcome anywhere. If you like, you can subscribed to speculation, Consumer Report Magazine. </p>
<p>I can see why you are a lawyer. Didn&#8217;t do a complete research to see that both the 2009 Dodge Ram and Challenger won five-stars. I won&#8217;t go into the two of the minis won the same for 09. </p>
<p>Stick with law for your lack of auto knowledge is revealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

